Search Reflection: When the Right Hire Isn't the One You Expected
One of our most rewarding searches this year began with a title that ultimately disappeared.
The engagement was initially framed as a search for a Chief Financial Officer.
By the time the search concluded, the firm had hired a Vice President of Finance & Operations.
At first glance, that may sound like a significant change. In reality, it reflected something much more valuable: a deeper understanding of the business problem the firm was trying to solve.
The client, an established early-stage venture capital firm, had already done the hard work. Together with an experienced HR consultant, they had developed a thoughtful position description centered on strengthening the firm's financial and operational infrastructure. The role would oversee fund operations, financial management, investor reporting, operational processes, and the systems needed to support the firm's continued growth.
The responsibilities were clear.
The title, and the profile, were not.
Should this be the firm's first full-time CFO? Should they continue leveraging their fractional CFO while adding an operational leader? Or did they need someone with deep venture fund operations experience who could independently own the day-to-day financial and operational infrastructure while partnering closely with the General Partners?
Those are very different searches.
As we brought candidates to the table, each conversation added another piece of the puzzle.
Rather than changing the role, the interview process helped clarify the type of leader who would be most successful. The hiring team recognized that they weren't looking for someone to redefine the firm's financial strategy—they already had trusted advisors supporting that work.
They were looking for an owner.
Someone who could take responsibility for fund operations, financial management, investor reporting, operational processes, and the firm's internal infrastructure. Someone comfortable working independently, building scalable processes, and creating the operational foundation that would enable the partners to spend more of their time where they create the greatest value: investing, supporting founders, and serving their investors.
That realization ultimately led to a different hiring decision than where the search began.
The firm ultimately hired a Vice President of Finance & Operations rather than a Chief Financial Officer. The shift reflected both a clearer understanding of the work itself and the breadth of capability they saw in the candidate they selected.
In a boutique investment firm, responsibilities rarely remain confined to a traditional functional lane. The successful candidate needed to bring strong financial judgment while also taking ownership across fund operations, reporting, systems, processes, and the broader operational needs of the business. The role called for someone who could move comfortably between strategic thinking and hands-on execution—building infrastructure where needed while remaining responsive to the evolving priorities of a small, collaborative team.
The title became more precise as the firm gained clarity about the actual scope of the role and recognized the unique combination of strengths the successful candidate could bring to it.
What Made the Search Successful
This outcome would not have been possible without an exceptional partnership.
The General Partner remained fully engaged throughout the process, and the firm's HR consultant played an invaluable role in facilitating thoughtful discussions and providing candid, actionable feedback after every interview.
Each debrief moved the search forward.
Rather than simply deciding whether a candidate should advance, we collectively asked:
What did we learn?
What qualities became more important?
Where did this candidate help us better define success?
That continuous feedback loop created momentum. By the later stages of the search, there was remarkable alignment—not only around the candidate, but around the role itself.
Our Takeaway
One of the greatest values of executive search isn't simply identifying talent.
It's using the search process to validate assumptions, test ideas against the market, and help leadership teams gain confidence that they're solving the right problem.
Sometimes that process confirms the original plan.
Sometimes it leads to a different title.
More often than not, it leads to a better hire.